Supreme Court Gives UGC Eight Weeks to Act on Caste Bias Recommendations

Rapid Summary

• Teh Supreme Court of India has directed the University Grants Commission (UGC) to incorporate stakeholder suggestions into the “promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions regulations, 2025” within eight weeks.
• the move follows a petition filed by the mothers of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi, who had died by suicide after facing caste-based discrimination on campuses.
• Close to 391 suggestions have been submitted regarding these regulations and are being reviewed by an expert UGC commitee chaired by Shailesh N. zala.
• Proposed measures include banning discriminatory practices, conducting social audits, providing mental health counseling for marginalized students, digitized scholarship systems to prevent fund delays, and setting up grievance redressal committees with representatives from SC/ST/OBC communities.
• Other recommendations involve withdrawal of grants from non-compliant institutions, mandatory NAAC reporting on anti-discrimination measures, witness protection-style mechanisms for complainants’ safety, and disciplinary actions against staff negligence.

Indian Opinion analysis

The directive signals urgency in addressing systemic caste-based discrimination prevalent in India’s higher education system. High-profile cases such as those involving Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi have underscored severe mental health repercussions for affected students. Approaching this issue holistically through multi-faceted reforms-including counseling support systems-reflects a shift from mere acknowledgment toward implementation-focused solutions.

Additionally, introducing accountability mechanisms like digitized scholarships and strict institutional compliance benchmarks could drive significant reform while safeguarding marginalized groups economically and socially. Though, challenges may emerge with enforcement consistency across diverse institutions nationwide given potential resistance or resource constraints.

With an imposed eight-week deadline for regulation revision under UGC oversight-a quick turnaround reflects political will but necessitates careful deliberation to balance robustness with feasibility.

Read more: Link