Mehbooba Mufti Accuses Government of Using AAP MLA’s Detention to Shift Focus from Hazratbal Incident

Rapid Summary

• Mehbooba Mufti, PDP president and former Chief Minister of Jammu & kashmir, alleged that AAP MLA Mehraj Malik was detained under the public Safety Act (PSA) to divert attention from the Hazratbal emblem controversy.
• Malik, also president of AAP’s J&K unit, was detained on September 8, 2025, for allegedly disturbing public order in Doda district and is now lodged in Kathua jail.
• The Hazratbal incident involved alleged desecration that hurt religious sentiments; Mufti criticized authorities for filing cases against people expressing anger rather than addressing grievances against the Waqf board and its chairperson.
• Mufti urged Jammu & Kashmir’s Lieutenant Governor to withdraw FIRs related to the Hazratbal incident and release Malik, questioning whether PSA detention is warranted for harsh language or criticism.
• She highlighted adverse conditions due to recent heavy rainfall in Doda district and suggested administrative focus should shift toward relief efforts instead of punitive measures against public representatives.

Read More

Indian Opinion Analysis
Mehbooba Mufti’s remarks highlight concerns regarding governance openness in Jammu & Kashmir following two contentious events: the detention of MLA Mehraj Malik under PSA and public discontent over the Hazratbal emblem controversy. Her statement calls attention to potential suppression of dissent and also prioritization issues within local governance-notably at a time when regions like Doda are grappling with flood-related hardships.

The contrast between administrative efforts focused on detentions versus disaster relief raises questions about resource allocation. While legal frameworks like PSA are meant for severe security threats, their invocation against elected representatives over speech demands scrutiny regarding proportionality and impact on democratic norms. Moreover, such actions risk fueling perceptions of political bias or erosion of trust among constituents.

In terms of broader implications for India’s governance framework in sensitive areas like Jammu & Kashmir, balancing action against potential unrest while safeguarding civil liberties remains an ongoing challenge. Encouraging dialog-based resolution over punitive measures could improve community relations without compromising law enforcement efficacy-an approach critical not only locally but across diverse contexts where tensions may arise.