Aligarh Court Rejects Police Report in Manusmriti Tearing Case Against RJD Spokesperson

Quick Summary

• Incident and FIR: Rashtriya Janata dal (RJD) spokesperson Priyanka Bharti is accused of tearing pages of the Manusmriti, a Hindu text, during a live TV debate. An FIR was filed in December 2024 by Bharat Tiwari, secretary of the Rashtriya Savarna Parishad, citing deliberate insult to religious sentiments under section 299 of the Bharatiya nyaya Sanhita.
• Police and Court Developments: A closure report submitted by Aligarh police claimed no crime occurred locally as it happened in delhi. However, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Rashi Tomar rejected this on September 6 and ordered further investigation.
• protest Petition: Bharat Tiwari alleged that investigators acted mechanically and under influence while filing the closure report.
• High court Stance: The Allahabad High Court upheld that tearing pages of Manusmriti reflects “malicious and deliberate intention” without lawful justification.

!Image caption as provided

Read more

Indian Opinion Analysis

The controversy surrounding Priyanka Bharti highlights ongoing tensions regarding interpretations of religious texts and their role in contemporary society.Allegations such as these are bound to evoke strong responses given India’s pluralistic yet deeply spiritual cultural fabric.This case also touches upon key concerns around freedom of expression vis-à-vis respect for religious sentiment.

The court’s insistence on further investigation emphasizes institutional rigor in addressing such sensitive matters while navigating jurisdictional technicalities raised by the police report. Additionally, there is legal precedent being strengthened-via High Court opinions-that acts deemed overtly provocative targeting specific communities or beliefs might potentially be scrutinized within constitutional frameworks ensuring both individual freedoms and collective harmony.

The outcome will likely carry broader significance for how India mediates debates at intersections involving religion,law,politics,and free speech going forward.