Quick Summary
- The family of Pahalgam terror attack victim Shubham Dwivedi criticized the BCCI’s decision to allow india-pakistan Asia Cup 2025 clash.
- Sanjay Dwivedi, Shubham’s father, questioned the BCCI’s stance and referred to Pakistan as a “terrorist nation.”
- He referenced historical Olympic boycotts (1980 moscow Olympics and 1984 Los Angeles Olympics) as precedents for India potentially refusing participation.
- Sanjay argued that stopping cricket relations with Pakistan aligns with cutting other ties due to terrorism concerns.
- Aishanya Dwivedi, Shubham’s mother, expressed fears that financial gains from the match could rebuild terror outfits in Pakistan destroyed during Operation Sindoor.
- She urged for stronger stances by Indian cricketers and authorities towards boycotting all matches involving Pakistan in international tournaments.
Indian Opinion Analysis
The comments by the family of a terror attack victim highlight an emotional yet crucial debate surrounding bilateral sports relations between India and Pakistan amidst geopolitical tensions. While historical examples like Olympic boycotts exist, cricket holds unique cultural importance in both nations. This imparts economic stakes to such clashes apart from diplomatic signaling. Boycotting matches might represent moral solidarity but raises practical challenges including obligations under international sports bodies. For policymakers and organizers like BCCI, balancing sentiments of affected families while upholding commitments within global frameworks remains critical.Read more: Link