CJI Gavai Defends Secularism Amid Criticism Over Khajuraho Case Remarks

Quick Summary

• Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai affirmed his respect for all religions amidst criticism over remarks related to a Lord Vishnu idol reconstruction case at Khajuraho’s Javari Temple.
• The CJI stated his belief in secularism, which was supported by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who objected to social media misrepresenting comments out of context. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal described social media as an “unruly horse.”
• On May 16, the Supreme Court Bench led by the CJI and Justice K. Vinod Chandran dismissed a plea seeking reconstruction and reinstallation of the damaged seven-foot Lord Vishnu idol in Chhatarpur district’s Javari Temple,deeming it “publicity interest litigation.”
• During proceedings, CJI remarked that devotees should pray or meditate instead of filing such litigation and suggested alternative worship at another prominent Shiva linga within the UNESCO World Heritage Khajuraho temple complex.

Indian Opinion Analysis
The supreme Court’s dismissal of this plea reflects its established stance against frivolous or “publicity interest litigations,” focusing on legal principles rather than emotional appeals tied to cultural or religious sentiments. The matter highlights broader challenges around managing heritage-based disputes without undermining India’s pluralistic values or judicial impartiality. Chief Justice Gavai’s emphasis on secularism underscores a commitment toward respecting all faiths while deterring misuse of judiciary for personal agendas under religious dedications.

This case also sheds light on how modern interaction platforms like social media can amplify controversies through selective interpretations-creating risks in misinforming public perception about judicial processes. It serves as a reminder for careful usage and scrutiny regarding sensitive subjects such as religion within India’s diverse societal fabric.

Read More: the Hindu Article