– Non-compliance with Supreme Court guidelines from the Prakash Singh case regarding the merit-based selection adn minimum two-year tenure for DGP appointments.
– Alleged delay by the Tamil Nadu government in submitting eligible candidates’ lists to UPSC resulted in Mr. Venkatraman’s ad-hoc appointment.
– Suspicion of potential political interference ahead of state assembly elections in 2026 due to this appointment.
– Quash Mr. Venkatraman’s appointment notice and follow Supreme Court guidelines for regularizing the recruitment process.
– Untill then, appoint one of the top three senior-most DGP-ranked officers.
The current legal challenge raises notable questions about adherence to procedural openness and institutional integrity in sensitive state appointments like that of a Director General of Police. The allegations underscore concerns over bypassing established Supreme Court-directed processes, which are meant to ensure meritocracy and stability within law enforcement leadership roles.
While it is indeed vital for governance systems to function without undue delays or interruptions caused by administrative lapses, deviations from prescribed procedures risk fostering mistrust among stakeholders and citizens alike.Furthermore, given its timing just ahead of critical democratic exercises such as state elections planned for next year, such an issue might escalate apprehensions about potential misuse or perception bias associated with law enforcement under interim heads.
Ultimately, this case not only scrutinizes accountability within Tamil Nadu but also underscores broader implications concerning adherence to judicial directives across states regarding leadership selection processes-a cornerstone principle underpinning impartial governance frameworks.
—
Read more at: Source Link