– Clear alignment of consumer tariffs with actual costs.
– On-time subsidy payments by State governments.
– Mechanisms like automatic fuel cost adjustments and regular true-ups for reconciling expenses annually.
– Enforcing limits on regulatory asset accumulation through disciplined accounting practices by regulators.
The Supreme Court’s intervention highlights the critical inefficiencies plaguing India’s electricity sector. Regulatory assets reflect deeper structural challenges such as balancing consumer affordability while maintaining financial sustainability for DISCOMs. By requiring timely liquidation of these deferred costs with transparency measures like audits and recovery roadmaps, the court aims to mitigate long-term financial distress while signalling urgency in fiscal discipline.
For India’s policymakers and power industry stakeholders, this presents an opportunity to overhaul outdated systems tying electricity pricing more closely to real costs without disproportionately burdening vulnerable communities. The introduction of global models like Regulated Asset Base systems further suggests that innovation could build resilience into India’s system over time. However, accomplished implementation will depend heavily on coordinated action among regulators, state authorities, DISCOMs themselves-and accountability measures embedded at all levels.