Slashing Programs That Help People with Disabilities Is a Nod to Eugenics

Quick Summary

• The Trump administration is implementing policies that impact Social Security, Veterans Affairs, and Education departments, targeting services for disabled individuals.
• Cuts to disability benefits are being justified in the name of “government efficiency” but criticized as ableist and grounded in eugenics ideology.
• Recent policy changes include making it harder to access Social Security benefits, reducing accommodations for veterans and students with disabilities, and retracting federal assistance programs for businesses serving disabled individuals.
• Medicaid cuts proposed by Congress will affect 15 million people with disabilities who rely on the program for healthcare access.
• Legal challenges have arisen around Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act; states like Texas oppose its antidiscrimination protections.
• Federal research funds supporting studies on disability have also been largely eliminated.
• Thes actions collectively target vulnerable populations-disability advocates argue they may significantly undermine equal treatment under U.S. law.

Read More

Indian opinion Analysis

The Trump administration’s approach towards disability programs highlights a broader philosophical debate about the roles of federal versus state governments in protecting vulnerable populations. By shifting obligation away from national standards to individual states or private institutions, this reduction in oversight risks creating uneven care systems across regions-a concern India has also faced when devolving welfare responsibilities during varying political eras.

for India, where equitable social safety nets remain critical given its diverse population and widespread socioeconomic disparities, such developments emphasize caution over governmental minimalism. Policies prioritizing inclusivity-whether through education frameworks or welfare schemes-demand a nuanced balance between fiscal prudence and societal equity. These implications serve as a reminder that economic strategies must account for human dignity beyond efficiency metrics.

Read More